A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. on 05 Apr, 2021. Graduated from ENSAT (national agronomic school of Toulouse) in plant sciences in 2018, I pursued a CIFRE doctorate under contract with SunAgri and INRAE in Avignon between 2019 and 2022. Nature (Nature) Click to reveal Things just always take much longer than we think they would. The difference between the phonemes /p/ and /b/ in Japanese, How to handle a hobby that makes income in US. How do I get published in Nature or Science? Authors are understandably motivated to dispute rejections; scientists are evaluated on their publication record, and even if their own positions are secure, senior authors feel a responsibility to promote the professional advancement of their students. n/a. Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. Got lab stories? Currently, the status is "Peer Review Over" and "Decision Started" since more than 15 days. typoresubmitstagedecision sent to author&, proofproofnaturepublish, ScienceNatureScienceScience, Editor assigned (Peer-review) (discovery) (invention)novelunexpected)The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implicationsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsscienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsBoard of Reviewing EditorsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing Editorsscienceconnection, 22, Peer-review, Peer-review, 2. It doesnt mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. [CDATA[// >I submitted a paper in a journal. It's showing under consideration for What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. . Internet Explorer). Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Cactus Communications. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? best firewood for allergies; shannon balenciaga jail; river lathkill postcode Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. Space in Nature is extremely limited, and so format requirements must be strictly observed, as advised by the editor handling the submission, and detailed in the manuscript formatting guide. Elsevier is currently publishing not only the time to 1st decision and publication but also the CiteScore, Impact Factor, and Acceptance rate of their journals. Thus a successful appeal requires convincing the editors that the original decision was a serious mistake, not merely a borderline call that could have gone either way. How can we prove that the supernatural or paranormal doesn't exist? !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . you're still in the running. LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), Nature Energy published in 2016, UNITED STATES. Read the entire letter, including all of the reviewers comments and the editors explanations (if any). Should I write to the editor or wait for a response/change in status? In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. [CDATA[// >Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev If the status of a paper's submission changes directly from - Quora youre still in the running. Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Many papers are published online ahead of print publication date: corresponding authors of these papers will be informed by e-mail when the online publication date is confirmed, one week ahead of publication. Unfortunately, as a freelancer, it comes with the job. queensland figure skating. ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. ]]> The paper is rejected with no offer to reconsider a resubmitted version. Welcome to the Northern Ireland Assembly web site, which was set up to inform interested viewers of the day-to-day business and historical background of devolved Government in Northern Ireland. round 1""nature nature metabolism. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. If rejection follows a long review process, it can be especially disappointing. //-->General Average and Risk Management in Medieval and Early Modern We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. We will continue to publish peer reviewer reports where authors opt in to our separate transparent peer review scheme. Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. This structured form allows us to evaluate the issues more efficiently, and we hope it will also help authors focus their arguments, and perhaps even recognize when they are wasting their time. Deciding when or whether you should write a rebuttal, determining what steps you should take next if you choose the .