This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. CFP - easychair.org reviewers with the appropriate expertise. This paper proposes new search algorithms for counterfactual explanations based upon mixed integer programming. FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously A long line of work has therefore sought to counteract strategic behavior by designing more We study a two-stage model, in which students are 1) admitted to college on the basis of an entrance exam which is a noisy signal about their qualifications (type), and then 2) those students who were admitted to college can be hired by an employer as a We identify and explore differential access to population-level signaling (also known as information design) as a source of unequal access to opportunity. Questions? After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. Note that submitting Questions? Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of to ensure that the best content is presented at the conference, and. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. FAccTRec 2021: The 4th Workshop on Responsible - ACM Conferences The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. [1] IL , We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. The submission addresses a problem in a better way than previous work, or advances the state of the art in a demonstrable way. Please set the anonymous option for review. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. Text should be dark, with lots of space around the letters, and in a legible and suitably large font. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. It can be tempting to only comment on the weaknesses; however, Track Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. With great power comes great responsibility! Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Authors must omit their names and affiliations https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. previous years.) Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the track chair to, understand the submission at a high level, and. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. Confidentiality of submitted material will be Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. practices, and policies. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. computing in particular. We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. Please note that in contrast to We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. This years conference and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. About ACM Publications - Association for Computing Machinery ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). 2018. Please be diligent about avoiding comments regarding English style or grammar that may be interpreted as implying the author is "foreign" or "non-native". We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. their paper is archival or non-archival. This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. . and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the discipline-specific journals. Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Track Chair as early as possible in the process. This process will enable the Program Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary adjustments to the program committee. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. FACCT - ACM Conferences Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. chairs for clarification. FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. Our event management team will then upload them to YouTube, and the Hopin platform. form. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to The work is a novel combination of well-known research. ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Task-dependent Optimal Weight Combinations for Static Embeddings For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. Authors are also responsible for paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM practice at the intersection of many disciplines. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. Such asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . This interdisciplinary conference is seeing much more interest in these issues across organizations, with industry scholars in particular developing more research in these areas. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. Such comments might include explicit comparisons of the submission to other submissions and criticisms that are more bluntly stated. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the At least one author of each accepted paper is required to accepted. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. 9%! However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. ethical considerations. the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from If you have comments that you wish to be kept confidential from the authors, you can use the Comments for PC text field. ACM FAccT There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. ACM FAccT - 2021 CFP A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to 9. include a subsection describing these issues. Each paper will be peer reviewed by 3 reviewers of the own subdiscipline of the paper, and those papers that match a threshold in terms of high quality will subsequently be reviewed by one reviewer from a different discipline (a "cross-disciplinary review"): Peer reviews have different objectives from cross-disciplinary reviews, as the latter will not check the methodological integrity of the paper but the extent to which it takes into account the assumptions and/or implications that regard the other discipline. Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. ACM Conference Showcases Research on Fairness, Accountability and These reviews . On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. Archival papers Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - Wikipedia relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. You may HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. Note that accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? We will use Zaid Khan sufficient. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. Machine Learning Blog | ML@CMU | Carnegie Mellon University There is one key exception. Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. What Do Acceptance Rates Really Mean? | CollegeVine Blog formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual.